GPT-4oとSerpAPIに基づくAI駆動型のオンラインツール検索機
上級
これはMarket Research, AI Chatbot分野の自動化ワークフローで、26個のノードを含みます。主にMerge, Aggregate, Agent, ChatTrigger, ToolSerpApiなどのノードを使用。 GPT-4oとSerpAPIを使ってオンラインツールを調査・比較
前提条件
- •OpenAI API Key
使用ノード (26)
ワークフロープレビュー
ノード接続関係を可視化、ズームとパンをサポート
ワークフローをエクスポート
以下のJSON設定をn8nにインポートして、このワークフローを使用できます
{
"id": "ZQOaEe4Th7t9QSFu",
"meta": {
"instanceId": "d92ae4b43988b888be9e59a711908a679453e558f86530d2ed2c1c3491f22bf5",
"templateCredsSetupCompleted": true
},
"name": "AI-Powered Online Tool Finder Utilizing GPT-4o and SerpAPI",
"tags": [],
"nodes": [
{
"id": "804eae08-ed38-4f59-8dfb-6bebf4a78e8b",
"name": "チャットメッセージ受信時",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.chatTrigger",
"position": [
-240,
80
],
"webhookId": "cc8eca94-779d-41f0-a0f4-46e9e90a2f4b",
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"typeVersion": 1.1
},
{
"id": "f9967b15-67f5-4d58-9190-180a82997b40",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model1",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
60,
320
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"id": "hghRc8fMDt5M0xCj",
"name": "OpenAi account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "8faa04e9-ce12-49f8-951f-3235d3576ecc",
"name": "Window Buffer Memory1",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.memoryBufferWindow",
"position": [
200,
320
],
"parameters": {},
"typeVersion": 1.3
},
{
"id": "4799d172-cda2-462b-94b2-d544a8acbe6e",
"name": "SerpAPI1",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
320,
320
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"id": "oQgZ79QKxNtXt6ty",
"name": "SerpAPI account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "4d6da77f-07cd-40fc-9b8e-1fc3e32b4831",
"name": "Structured Output Parser",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.outputParserStructured",
"position": [
460,
320
],
"parameters": {
"jsonSchemaExample": " {\n \"topic\":\"USER_INPUT_TOPIC\",\n \"ItemNames\": [\n \"Item_1\",\n \"Item_2\",\n \"Item_3\",\n \"Item_4\",\n \"Item_5\"\n ]\n }"
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "50c99d82-09dd-40ae-a109-7e7066a2a261",
"name": "Merge1",
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.merge",
"position": [
1840,
40
],
"parameters": {
"numberInputs": 5
},
"typeVersion": 3
},
{
"id": "092d819e-a96c-47ae-8002-97f47beeca59",
"name": "Aggregate1",
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.aggregate",
"position": [
2080,
80
],
"parameters": {
"options": {},
"fieldsToAggregate": {
"fieldToAggregate": [
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 1",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
},
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 2",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
},
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 3",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
},
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 4",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
},
{
"renameField": true,
"outputFieldName": "Output 5",
"fieldToAggregate": "output"
}
]
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "8d126a26-f902-4c62-b85b-07fa1e158e2b",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
2300,
260
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o-mini"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"id": "hghRc8fMDt5M0xCj",
"name": "OpenAi account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "23fdc7b4-5247-4e86-a3b7-f887d0c63c76",
"name": "SerpAPI",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
-380
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"id": "oQgZ79QKxNtXt6ty",
"name": "SerpAPI account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "95bb4b5f-0b07-4910-b941-bd70158a1c2b",
"name": "SerpAPI3",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
260
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"id": "oQgZ79QKxNtXt6ty",
"name": "SerpAPI account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "5ece162d-1eef-48aa-9c36-f902765596a8",
"name": "SerpAPI4",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
620
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"id": "oQgZ79QKxNtXt6ty",
"name": "SerpAPI account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "aad193d4-447d-4a4e-aa64-11b0cb517171",
"name": "SerpAPI5",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
980
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"id": "oQgZ79QKxNtXt6ty",
"name": "SerpAPI account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "e5b22323-aa70-4a46-be43-0981f5b043a1",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model2",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1040,
-380
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"id": "hghRc8fMDt5M0xCj",
"name": "OpenAi account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "bf7ac647-f8b0-43a1-adaa-e65a5d5eaab6",
"name": "SerpAPI2",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolSerpApi",
"position": [
1320,
-60
],
"parameters": {
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"serpApi": {
"id": "oQgZ79QKxNtXt6ty",
"name": "SerpAPI account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "27badea6-7a4d-4c22-990c-8d5f5b0c4d72",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model3",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1040,
-60
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"id": "hghRc8fMDt5M0xCj",
"name": "OpenAi account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "f8a34202-1eae-4c25-b487-7e374e52b942",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model4",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1040,
260
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"id": "hghRc8fMDt5M0xCj",
"name": "OpenAi account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "dd164dae-8506-49d5-bc2c-2c3766963518",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model5",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1040,
620
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"id": "hghRc8fMDt5M0xCj",
"name": "OpenAi account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "5ea4bb0d-9305-40c1-9d1f-7f3b9de8c66c",
"name": "OpenAI Chat Model6",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.lmChatOpenAi",
"position": [
1060,
960
],
"parameters": {
"model": {
"__rl": true,
"mode": "list",
"value": "gpt-4o",
"cachedResultName": "gpt-4o"
},
"options": {}
},
"credentials": {
"openAiApi": {
"id": "hghRc8fMDt5M0xCj",
"name": "OpenAi account"
}
},
"typeVersion": 1.2
},
{
"id": "8c47d041-6429-423a-a729-412212162fa1",
"name": "レビュアー1",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1100,
-560
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[0] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[0] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n \nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only—no one‑time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14‑day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single‑trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization—image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular “if–then” logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your “From” address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price‑performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi‑channel features; extensive integrations (5,500–7,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4–5/5 on ease‑of‑use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user‑friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time‑saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3–9 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct 2024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease‑of‑use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--“Constant Contact is simply a bad product… way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]”. \n--“Takes FOREVER… crashes nonstop… HOGS my CPU”.\n--Also reports of “difficult cancellation” and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5—strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3–4)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92–97%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K–7K+ apps), including CRM, e‑commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2–3)\n-Automation is basic—limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features—value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations—template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom—and want maximum value—it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns.\n\n\n"
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "fb3012d9-79c1-4022-bb20-f9dafd92e11e",
"name": "レビュアー2",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1100,
-240
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[1] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[1] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n \nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only—no one‑time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14‑day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single‑trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization—image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular “if–then” logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your “From” address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price‑performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi‑channel features; extensive integrations (5,500–7,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4–5/5 on ease‑of‑use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user‑friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time‑saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3–9 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct 2024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease‑of‑use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--“Constant Contact is simply a bad product… way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]”. \n--“Takes FOREVER… crashes nonstop… HOGS my CPU”.\n--Also reports of “difficult cancellation” and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5—strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3–4)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92–97%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K–7K+ apps), including CRM, e‑commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2–3)\n-Automation is basic—limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features—value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations—template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom—and want maximum value—it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns."
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "61969345-1f69-4442-8b5a-720071a586e7",
"name": "レビュアー3",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1120,
80
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[2] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[2] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n \nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only—no one‑time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14‑day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single‑trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization—image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular “if–then” logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your “From” address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price‑performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi‑channel features; extensive integrations (5,500–7,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4–5/5 on ease‑of‑use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user‑friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time‑saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3–9 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct 2024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease‑of‑use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--“Constant Contact is simply a bad product… way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]”. \n--“Takes FOREVER… crashes nonstop… HOGS my CPU”.\n--Also reports of “difficult cancellation” and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5—strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3–4)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92–97%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K–7K+ apps), including CRM, e‑commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2–3)\n-Automation is basic—limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features—value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations—template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom—and want maximum value—it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns."
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "bd003e0d-8a6f-488b-84ae-d9ff64461074",
"name": "レビュアー4",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1120,
420
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[3] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[3] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n \nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only—no one‑time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14‑day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single‑trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization—image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular “if–then” logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your “From” address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price‑performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi‑channel features; extensive integrations (5,500–7,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4–5/5 on ease‑of‑use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user‑friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time‑saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3–9 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct 2024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease‑of‑use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--“Constant Contact is simply a bad product… way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]”. \n--“Takes FOREVER… crashes nonstop… HOGS my CPU”.\n--Also reports of “difficult cancellation” and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5—strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3–4)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92–97%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K–7K+ apps), including CRM, e‑commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2–3)\n-Automation is basic—limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features—value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations—template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom—and want maximum value—it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns."
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "928a58d0-e69e-414a-898c-b005df648a9b",
"name": "レビュアー5",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
1120,
780
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.output.ItemNames[4] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=#role\nYou are an agent whose goal is to evaluate an online tool or company at its ability to provide a specific task. You are an expert at reviewing and evaluating online products. You always provide the most up to date information. You will receive the name of a tool or a company as well as the task that is trying to be accomplished. These items will be {{ $json.output.ItemNames[4] }}. You will search for this item in order to find the price of usage, if there is a free version, is there a limit on how many tasks it can complete, and what are the reviews, pros or cons of the tool or company. Below is the format of how you should output your information. You should use google shopping on google search (SERPAPI) tool to obtain the most relevant and accurate information.\n \nName of company/tool\nPrice: Provide if it is a one time purchase, monthly subscription and if there is a free version.\nLimits: Provide any limitations on completing the desired tasks. Is there a limit on the number of tasks that can be completed? Does it only work with certain software?\nSummary of reviews: You should provide an overall summary of the reviews, how many reviews, as well as the star rating of each item. Go in depth on the summary of the reviews. Provide 3-4 pros and 2-3 cons of each item. \nConclusion:\n\n\n\n#additional information \n\n\nBelow is an example of how you should provide responses.\n\nConstant Contact\nPrice\n-Subscription-based only—no one‑time purchase or permanent free plan.\n-14‑day free trial available.\n-Plans begin at $12/month (Lite), then $35/month (Standard), and $80/month (Premium). \n\nLimits\n-Automation capabilities are basic: welcome emails, anniversary or birthday triggers, abandoned cart reminders (via Shopify/WooCommerce), and simple single‑trigger workflows.\n-Deeper automation (multi-step, advanced triggers, conditional logic) requires the Premium plan and is still less flexible than many competitors.\n-Templates and design editors offer limited customization—image swapping and background choices are constrained.\n-Supports up to unlimited lists but segmentation is limited unless on higher tiers and granular “if–then” logic is absent at lower levels.\n-Autoresponder only sends from your “From” address and does not capture replies within the platform.\n-Sends may have limits and overage fees; no unlimited sends plan. \n\nSummary of Reviews\n\n-Email Tool Tester (1.3 years ago)\n--Star rating not numeric; overall negative on automation.\n--Pros: Good deliverability; useful AI content drafting; supports basic automated campaigns like abandoned carts.\n--Cons: Poor price‑performance; limited automation; segmentation only on higher plans; challenging cancellation.\n\n-Moosend / MailerLite blog (~recent)\n--Pros: High deliverability (~92%); intuitive interface; multi‑channel features; extensive integrations (5,500–7,800 apps); good analytics.\n--Cons: Expensive at scale; automations limited; dated template designs; segmentation and testing capabilities minimal \nMailerLite.\n\n-G2 (various recent reviews)\n--High-end rating: average 4–5/5 on ease‑of‑use; automation rated well for simplicity but weaker on customization.\n--Review sample:\n--DeAnn B (5/5): praise for automation ease and organized segmented campaigns; minor template image issues.\n--Jerome T (3.5/5): automation user‑friendly, but less powerful than ActiveCampaign/Klaviyo.\n--Pros: Ease of use; time‑saving; good for weekly campaign sending; content creation tools; segmentation.\n--Cons: Missing advanced features; limited template customization; sequence edits require rebuild; editing glitches. \n\n-Business.com and Capterra (3–9 months ago)\n--Business.com rating 9.4/10: highlights autocomplete, autoresponders, deliverability, and editor; cons include no free plan, limited A/B testing, and no unlimited sends. \n--Capterra (Oct 2024): 5/5 overall; pro: ease‑of‑use, automation features; con: pricing high for small lists.\n\n-Reddit feedback\n--Mixed community opinions:\n--“Constant Contact is simply a bad product… way better deliverability, and amazing analytics [elsewhere]”. \n--“Takes FOREVER… crashes nonstop… HOGS my CPU”.\n--Also reports of “difficult cancellation” and aggressive upselling.\n\nOverall Rating\nBased on ~hundreds of reviews across platforms:\nAverage score: ~4/5—strong in usability and basic automation but weak in depth, customization, and price value.\n\nPros (3–4)\n-Easy to use and set up, especially for beginners. G2 notes intuitive campaign templates, drag-and-drop email creation. \n-Reliable deliverability (~92–97%) with built-in authentication tools \n-Time-saving email automation, including welcome sequences, anniversaries, abandoned carts, and non-opener resends. \n-Extensive integrations (5K–7K+ apps), including CRM, e‑commerce, social channels, event ticketing.\n\nCons (2–3)\n-Automation is basic—limited to single triggers, simple workflows; lacks conditional logic and advanced paths. \n-High cost for features—value diminishes rapidly with contacts list growth; extras (SMS, segmentation, A/B testing) only on higher tiers. \n-Design and editing limitations—template customization is rigid; editor can be glitchy; sequence adjustments may require rebuilding. \n\nConclusion\nConstant Contact is a solid choice for small businesses seeking easy-to-use, reliable email automation and deliverability with good integration options. However, if you need advanced, flexible automation, granular personalization, or modern design freedom—and want maximum value—it may fall short. Based on user feedback, it's best suited for basic autoresponder needs, not complex multistep campaigns."
},
"promptType": "define"
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "419cd0fd-d130-4060-bfd7-5a588cc1f22e",
"name": "コンパイラー",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
2360,
80
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json['Output 1'][0] }}{{ $json['Output 1'][1] }}{{ $json['Output 1'][2] }}{{ $json['Output 1'][3] }}{{ $json['Output 1'][4] }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "Role: \nYou are an organizing agent. You are to take the data and present it as 5 separate groups. One for each item. You are to combine it in a clean and efficient way. You are great at this and will make it look almost like a pamphlet. It is to be a list of items that a person is comparing in order to purchase an item from.\n\n\n\nConstraints: \nDo not change any of the original information, you can only reorganize it and present it in a clean fashion.\n"
},
"promptType": "define",
"hasOutputParser": true
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
},
{
"id": "cf248523-643e-40cb-8b2a-f59be732527e",
"name": "付箋ノート",
"type": "n8n-nodes-base.stickyNote",
"position": [
-260,
-780
],
"parameters": {
"color": 5,
"width": 920,
"height": 680,
"content": "Create an Open AI key:\n-Create an Open AI account. \n-Go to platform.openai.com/api-keysAfter creating an account, click on your name in the top right corner. \n-Click on your profile.\n-On the left side click on API keys.\n-Create a new secret key.\n-Give it a name (optional).\n-Create secret key and copy.\n-Open the n8n workflow.\n-Right click and open the first OpenAI chat model under Item finder tools Agent.\n-Click under credential to connect with and click create new credential.\n-Paste copied API Key in this position in n8n.\n-Use the same API key to open and connect with the OpenAI chat model for the Reviewer 1, Reviewer 2, Reviewer 3, Reviewer 4, Reviewer 5, and Compiler Tools Agents.\n-IMPORTANT: This workflow uses GPT-4o and GPT-4o-mini. This cost ~$0.06 per run. You must put money, recommend no more than $5, into your open ai account.\n-Click on your profile again. On left hand side click on billing. Add credit to balance.\n\n-Create SerpiApi account at https://serpapi.com/users/sign_up\n -After account creation, click on API key and copy it.\n -Right click open on serp API under the Item finder tools agent.\n -Click on credential to connect with.\n -Copy in API key.\n -Repeat the above 3 steps for Reviewer 1, Reviewer 2, Reviewer 3, Reviewer 4, and Reviewer 5 tools agent.\n -TIP: This workflow uses ~8-15 of the 100 free monthly SerpAPI searches. If you utilize more than 100 searches in a month you can create a new SerpAPI account and connect another API key to the tools agents.\n\n\n\n\nHow to use:\nIn the bottom, click on the open chat box. Type in the software item/tool you are trying to find. The workflow will automatically initiate. When it has completed you will see text on the right hand side under latest logs from the Compiler node. Scroll down until you see output. This is your information. I recommend copy and pasting it to a word document for ease of access at a later date. You can always find prior searches by clicking on executions at the top. You then right click and open the Compiler tools agent. Clicking on logs at the top and you will see the output information again. "
},
"typeVersion": 1
},
{
"id": "a128edb6-5b66-4737-8167-d4a1382c2fe9",
"name": "ツール検索器",
"type": "@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.agent",
"position": [
200,
80
],
"parameters": {
"text": "={{ $json.chatInput }}",
"options": {
"systemMessage": "=Role:\nYou are an expert in finding the best online services to complete a job and you always find the best options. You will receive a text prompt. This text prompt is {{ $json.chatInput }}. This text prompt will be a task that the user would like completed. Your goal is to find 5 online options of how that task can be completed. You will conduct a search with google search (SERPAPI) tool. Your query to google search (SERPAPI) tool should be things like \"Best options to {{ $json.chatInput }}\", \"Top end ways to {{ $json.chatInput }}\", or \"top rated services for {{ $json.chatInput }}\".\n\nCommand: With this search you will create a list of the 5 online tools or companies that provide the desired service. You should include the text prompt in your list at the end of the tool as you will be passing this information onto another agent who will need to know what the tool is utilized for. You will only provide the names of these companies or tools. You should preferentially choose tools or services that have the highest rating.\n\nConstraints:\nAvoid any repeat tools or services.\nYou must provide 5 tools or services. You cannot proceed with less than 5 items.\n\n\nFormat:\nExample output\nItem prompt: automatically respond to emails\n\n1. Constant Contact to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n2. Brevo to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n3. Klaviyo to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n4. Campaigner to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n5. Hubspot to {{ $json.chatInput }}\n \n\n\n"
},
"promptType": "define",
"hasOutputParser": true
},
"typeVersion": 1.7
}
],
"active": false,
"pinData": {},
"settings": {
"executionOrder": "v1"
},
"versionId": "39163d50-7156-44c3-965d-b2c72b6411ff",
"connections": {
"50c99d82-09dd-40ae-a109-7e7066a2a261": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "092d819e-a96c-47ae-8002-97f47beeca59",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"23fdc7b4-5247-4e86-a3b7-f887d0c63c76": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "8c47d041-6429-423a-a729-412212162fa1",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"419cd0fd-d130-4060-bfd7-5a588cc1f22e": {
"main": [
[]
]
},
"4799d172-cda2-462b-94b2-d544a8acbe6e": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "a128edb6-5b66-4737-8167-d4a1382c2fe9",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"bf7ac647-f8b0-43a1-adaa-e65a5d5eaab6": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "fb3012d9-79c1-4022-bb20-f9dafd92e11e",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"95bb4b5f-0b07-4910-b941-bd70158a1c2b": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "61969345-1f69-4442-8b5a-720071a586e7",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"5ece162d-1eef-48aa-9c36-f902765596a8": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "bd003e0d-8a6f-488b-84ae-d9ff64461074",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"aad193d4-447d-4a4e-aa64-11b0cb517171": {
"ai_tool": [
[
{
"node": "928a58d0-e69e-414a-898c-b005df648a9b",
"type": "ai_tool",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"092d819e-a96c-47ae-8002-97f47beeca59": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "419cd0fd-d130-4060-bfd7-5a588cc1f22e",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"8c47d041-6429-423a-a729-412212162fa1": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "50c99d82-09dd-40ae-a109-7e7066a2a261",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"fb3012d9-79c1-4022-bb20-f9dafd92e11e": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "50c99d82-09dd-40ae-a109-7e7066a2a261",
"type": "main",
"index": 1
}
]
]
},
"61969345-1f69-4442-8b5a-720071a586e7": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "50c99d82-09dd-40ae-a109-7e7066a2a261",
"type": "main",
"index": 2
}
]
]
},
"bd003e0d-8a6f-488b-84ae-d9ff64461074": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "50c99d82-09dd-40ae-a109-7e7066a2a261",
"type": "main",
"index": 3
}
]
]
},
"928a58d0-e69e-414a-898c-b005df648a9b": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "50c99d82-09dd-40ae-a109-7e7066a2a261",
"type": "main",
"index": 4
}
]
]
},
"a128edb6-5b66-4737-8167-d4a1382c2fe9": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "8c47d041-6429-423a-a729-412212162fa1",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
},
{
"node": "fb3012d9-79c1-4022-bb20-f9dafd92e11e",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
},
{
"node": "61969345-1f69-4442-8b5a-720071a586e7",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
},
{
"node": "bd003e0d-8a6f-488b-84ae-d9ff64461074",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
},
{
"node": "928a58d0-e69e-414a-898c-b005df648a9b",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"8d126a26-f902-4c62-b85b-07fa1e158e2b": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "419cd0fd-d130-4060-bfd7-5a588cc1f22e",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"f9967b15-67f5-4d58-9190-180a82997b40": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "a128edb6-5b66-4737-8167-d4a1382c2fe9",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"e5b22323-aa70-4a46-be43-0981f5b043a1": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "8c47d041-6429-423a-a729-412212162fa1",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"27badea6-7a4d-4c22-990c-8d5f5b0c4d72": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "fb3012d9-79c1-4022-bb20-f9dafd92e11e",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"f8a34202-1eae-4c25-b487-7e374e52b942": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "61969345-1f69-4442-8b5a-720071a586e7",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"dd164dae-8506-49d5-bc2c-2c3766963518": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "bd003e0d-8a6f-488b-84ae-d9ff64461074",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"5ea4bb0d-9305-40c1-9d1f-7f3b9de8c66c": {
"ai_languageModel": [
[
{
"node": "928a58d0-e69e-414a-898c-b005df648a9b",
"type": "ai_languageModel",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"8faa04e9-ce12-49f8-951f-3235d3576ecc": {
"ai_memory": [
[
{
"node": "a128edb6-5b66-4737-8167-d4a1382c2fe9",
"type": "ai_memory",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"4d6da77f-07cd-40fc-9b8e-1fc3e32b4831": {
"ai_outputParser": [
[
{
"node": "a128edb6-5b66-4737-8167-d4a1382c2fe9",
"type": "ai_outputParser",
"index": 0
}
]
]
},
"804eae08-ed38-4f59-8dfb-6bebf4a78e8b": {
"main": [
[
{
"node": "a128edb6-5b66-4737-8167-d4a1382c2fe9",
"type": "main",
"index": 0
}
]
]
}
}
}よくある質問
このワークフローの使い方は？
上記のJSON設定コードをコピーし、n8nインスタンスで新しいワークフローを作成して「JSONからインポート」を選択、設定を貼り付けて認証情報を必要に応じて変更してください。
このワークフローはどんな場面に適していますか？
上級 - 市場調査, AIチャットボット
有料ですか？
このワークフローは完全無料です。ただし、ワークフローで使用するサードパーティサービス（OpenAI APIなど）は別途料金が発生する場合があります。
関連ワークフロー
GPT-4oとSerpAPIを活用した人気エンドユーザー製品購入の特定
GPT-4oとSerpAPIを基盤としたAI駆動型製品リサーチ・比較ワークフロー
Merge
Aggregate
Agent
+
Merge
Aggregate
Agent
26 ノードAiAgent
人工知能
GPT-4o チャットで自然言語クエリから BigQuery SQL を生成
GPT-4o チャットを使って自然言語クエリから BigQuery SQL を生成する
Code
Merge
Aggregate
+
Code
Merge
Aggregate
13 ノードRobert Breen
内部Wiki
n8nノードの探索（可視化リファレンスライブラリ内）
n8nノードを可視化リファレンスライブラリで探索
If
Ftp
Set
+
If
Ftp
Set
113 ノードI versus AI
その他
GPT-5 Nano を使った多言語チャットボットによる EC 顧客サポートの自動化
GPT-5 Nano多言語チャットボットを使ってEC向け顧客サポートを自動化
Set
Merge
Split Out
+
Set
Merge
Split Out
13 ノードRobert Breen
AIチャットボット
GPT-4を活用したリアルタイムGoogleスプレッドシート分析用のチャットボット作成
リアルタイム Google シート分析のための GPT-4 データ分析チャットボット作成
Merge
Aggregate
Google Sheets
+
Merge
Aggregate
Google Sheets
17 ノードBilly Christi
AIチャットボット
Brazeで既存のメールテンプレートを更新
AIを使用してInstagram、Facebook、LinkedIn、Xでのソーシャルメディアコンテンツを自動化
Set
Gmail
Merge
+
Set
Gmail
Merge
73 ノードLukaszB
デザイン
ワークフロー情報
難易度
上級
ノード数26
カテゴリー2
ノードタイプ9
作成者
AiAgent
@lifehacksAs a self-taught entrepreneur, I’m passionate about automating everyday tasks to simplify life. Every system I create is designed to enhance efficiency and free up valuable time. Once I perfect an automation that transforms my own routine, I’m excited to share it with you—so you can experience the same benefits.
外部リンク
n8n.ioで表示 →
このワークフローを共有